Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.



By JM Talboo and Steve W.

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/10/debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theories.htmlMany people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.

 

The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States” - 
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 



We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.


[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]


And it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.


Unsurprisingly, they hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.

FAIR USE NOTICE

National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Nuclear Amber Alert was a Psyop to Distract Clinton Indictments - BREAKING INTEL! Hawaiian Nuclear False Missile Alert Staged By Deep State To Embarrass Trump - Deep State sends Hawaii into state of panic over ballistic missile warning



Nuclear Amber Alert was a Psyop to Distract Clinton Indictments - BREAKING INTEL! Hawaiian Nuclear False Missile Alert Staged By Deep State To Embarrass Trump - Deep State sends Hawaii into state of panic over ballistic missile warning

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Proof QANON Is Real-- In 3 Minutes, MSM Won't Touch This - #QAnon Is Our Deep Throat: The Game Changer That Will Destroy the #Sockpuppet #MSM #FakeNews Shills - 4Chan poster, QAnon, seems to have predicted +++ in Trump tweet - Intelligence Analyst Dr. Jerome Corsi Lays Out His Case That QAnon Is An Intelligence Source & Close to the President - High Level Intelligence Source Confirms QAnon Is REAL



http://dailyrabbithole.com/index.php/2017/11/07/4chan-poster-qanon-seems-to-have-predicted-in-trump-tweet/

Dr. Jerome Corsi is one the foremost intelligence analysts in media today. He has written two New York Times best selling books and is a Harvard PhD in Political Science...



Proof QANON Is Real-- In 3 Minutes, MSM Won't Touch This - #QAnon Is Our Deep Throat: The Game Changer That Will Destroy the #Sockpuppet #MSM #FakeNews Shills - 4Chan poster, QAnon, seems to have predicted +++ in Trump tweet - Intelligence Analyst Dr. Jerome Corsi Lays Out His Case That QAnon Is An Intelligence Source & Close to the President - High Level Intelligence Source Confirms QAnon Is REAL

Related:

The Secrets of QAnon, The Storm, and The Deep State Counterstike - Wow, QANON's Identity Revealed + Donald Trump's Storm Is Underway - A Primer on #QAnon and #QClearance: What You Should Know and Why #DeepState Is in #DefCon1 Panic:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/12/wow-qanons-identity-revealed-donald.html

Saturday, January 6, 2018

American Idiot & Green Day Frontman Billie Joe Armstrong tells fan who supports Trump on Instagram to ' F---Off '



American Idiot & Green Day Frontman Billie Joe Armstrong tells fan who supports Trump on Instagram to ' F---Off '

After a fan argued that “people have the right to support Trump” and that Armstrong’s comment “won’t change anything to Trump supporters,” the singer is reported to have fired back: “Well then go fuck your self you stupid piece of shit. If that’s the way you feel about mass destruction and murder then fuck off. Stay the fuck off my Instagram and don’t come back.”

“Don’t listen to my fucking records,” Armstrong added. “I have no problem telling ignorant fucks like you to go to hell. That goes for any other stupid fucks that think this behavior should normalized. Get the fuck out!”
Read more at
http://www.nme.com/news/music/billie-joe-armstrong-tells-trump-supporting-fan-to-stop-listening-to-green-day-2204587#3jckKzwUlHtCE1QY.99


Diagnosis for Billie Joe Armstrong is: Trump derangement syndrome. Poor guy. Here's the truth about the POTUS in general and the issue Billie was running his mouth about:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/03/trump-is-wrong-vs-trump-is-right-lists.html

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/10/trump-rhetoric-vs-realitydont-mistake.html

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2018/01/rush-defends-trumps-nuke-button-tweet.html


He hasn't a clue how much of his success is thanks to people he is now telling to fuck off. I'm one of them and I suspect there are many more than he thinks. What a piece of ungrateful, ignorant, filth he is. He definitely puts the punk in punk rock. Lowbrow songs in your fake British accent about how you enjoy masturbation is your forte, Billie. Please leave politics to real researchers with higher IQs than you. YOU are now an American idiot. I was with you back in those days, but it's become obvious that you are just a trendy dumb fuck. So, YOU fuck off, sir!

The gun pictured below was made special just for you, Mr. Armstrong, who was raised in Rodeo, California. Here is what the punk rock band I used to be in had to say about pompous punkers from your horrible home state...



Well, I'm done with text, allow the music to retort...

Joe Rogan and Eddie Bravo GO DEEP on 9-11, And Chester Bennington Suicide Conspiracy!! + Related Info That Eddie Bravo Needs to Show Joe Rogan



Joe Rogan and Eddie Bravo GO DEEP on 9-11, And Chester Bennington Suicide Conspiracy!!

Related Info That Eddie Bravo Needs to Show Joe Rogan:

FAQ 6 written by yours truly...

FAQ #6: WHY DOES AE911TRUTH REPRESENT ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS?

Most architects and engineers have never been presented with the scientific evidence of controlled demolition. In addition, most of those who take the time to examine this evidence acknowledge that the official story can’t be true. As of the date of this publication, there are almost 1,700 architects and engineers who openly support the findings of AE911Truth vs. only a few dozen who have openly supported the NIST WTC reports. Even so, in the end, the evidence stands on its own, regardless of how many professionals are aware of it.  A more detailed answer is available here.


Why Have Nearly 3,000 Architects and Engineers Signed our Petition?

Obeid studied WTC 7's collapse from a structural standpoint: “The theories in the NIST report were flawed. The sequence, as demonstrated in their computer model, indicates that one girder was pushed off of its seat on the supporting column, which commenced the failure sequence. That then led to a progressive collapse near the corner of the building, which then, they say, dragged the entire building down — and that happens symmetrically into its own footprint!” Having had the opportunity to review WTC 7’s blueprints as a structural engineer, Obeid cites specifics as to why the official cascading failure story doesn't offer adequate explanation...

I've read expert reports on the collapse by other structural engineers regarding the NIST explanation, and I found that in each case the scope of their discussions are so limited, so circumscribed, that they're really useless as far as analysis is concerned. Not one structural engineer discusses the whole story, or how this 'perfect storm' of circumstances came to pass.

More:

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/397-why-have-nearly-3-000-architects-and-engineers-signed-our-petition.html

At the 2015 Structural Engineering Summit

Two-Dozen Structural Engineers Sign the Petition

Many Still Don’t Know about WTC 7

While some of the engineers needed more time to review the evidence — and we applaud them for taking the time to study it — roughly half of them quickly recognized WTC 7’s destruction as a controlled demolition and 24 took the courageous step of signing our petition. One cannot help but conclude that the single biggest obstacle to mobilizing the engineering profession to support a new investigation is the basic lack of awareness of WTC 7.

More:

http://action.ae911truth.org/o/50694/t/0/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=1331843












One outcome of our insistence on remaining true to our mission is that our ranks of signatories has swelled from less than a dozen to more than 2,300 building and technical professionals who are petitioning the government for a new, independent investigation of the catastrophic destruction at the World Trade Center on 9/11.


 Additionally, over 20,000 citizens have signed the AE911Truth petition, and more than 250,000 supporters have "liked" our Facebook page. Last August we introduced this once-taboo topic with a 45-minute interview on C-SPAN, foiling a mainstream media blackout and allowing a national audience of millions to finally hear the most poignant — and suppressed — facts about that fatal day.


More:

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/199-news-media-events-60-structural-engineers.html



 AE911Truth Structural Engineer Dismantles the NIST Analysis of WTC 7

Dwain Deets
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Posted May 20, 2010

Brookman is one of over 40 structural engineers who have signed the AE911Truth petition calling for a truly independent investigation of the events of 9/11, with emphasis on the destruction of the WTC Towers and WTC building 7. He is also one of the interviewees in the article, 29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High–Rises on 9/11. For a broader book–length exposé on WTC 7 see also David Ray Griffin’s The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center7 — Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False.
Brookman received his M.S. in Structural Engineering (1986) from the University of California at Davis, following a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the same school in 1984. He has over 23 years experience in structural analysis, design, evaluation and rehabilitation of buildings in northern California.

More:
http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/ptv-faqs/288-ae911truth-structural-engineer-dismantles-the-nist-analysis-of-wtc-7.html


Related:

Hey Joe Rogan, Debunk This!
Debunking Joe Rogan on Alien Abduction